–> One entry so far, but many UPDATES below…
As I said yesterday, I’ll post my analysis of the President’s State of the Union address later today on Presidential Campaign Rhetoric 2004. I have a few initial reactions to the style of delivery that I offer “for what it’s worth.”
1) Bush deviated a bit from the standard genre, or structural pattern, of a mid-term address. Such deviation is important to consider in the analysis of this address. We got two speeches for the price of one.
2) The Bush persona changed (more measured and resolute). Gone was the trademark smirk. No leaning on the podium. No chopping motions with his hands. Bush got out of the way of his own words and sounded/appeared more presidential than in previous addresses.
3) A weak reaction address by the Democrats heightened the effect of Bush’s delivery.
UPDATE (10:24 a.m.): Howard Kurtz offers a coverage-and-punditry round-up of the State of the Union address. There’s a lot of talk about the speech being two for the price of one (structurally)–a policy laundry list and a foreign policy address.
UPDATE (1:12 p.m.): David Frum, former Bush speechwriter, has this to say. I disagree with his assessment of the speech as a “step-down in quality.” I think he considers himself the only speechwriter worthy of the task, re: his “axis of evil” line.
I have finished my initial analysis–on paper–and will complete its online version soon. The process is rather entertaining–colored pens, colored markers, lots of lines and annotations and idiosyncratic symbols. A student dropped by and watched me for a few minutes–chuckling several times at the sight of me hunched over the speech grasping for pens and markers while sipping coffee and eating Chili Cheese Fritos from tiny bags.
UPDATE (1:30 p.m.): SpinSanity counters the tax spin. Bush says accelerated tax cuts will lower the taxes for a family of four–income $40,000–from $1,178 to $45 per year. …pregnant pause… I don’t get it, either.